RUMOR: Typings of the Pokémon Sun & Moon Stater Evolutions LEAKED?!

SPOILERS?! This is a rumor post, but because this is based on what was dug up from official sources and not typical online hearsay, we’re warning you now: this could reveal new information.

YouTuber pdwinnall has discovered that the Japanese Pokémon mini-site for Sun & Moon contains extra icons for types that identify the starters. You can watch the video above to see exactly how it works, but essentially there are six images for the types:

  1. Grass (Rowlet, type 1)
  2. Flying (Rowlet, type 2)
  3. Ground (???)
  4. Fire (Litten)
  5. Water (Popplio)
  6. Fighting (???)

burrowing-owlSUSPICIOUS, eh? The YouTuber hypothesizes that Rowlet’s family will remain Grass/Flying, Litten’s will end up Fire/Ground  (oops, fixed: thanks CaH) and Popplio’s family will wind up Water/Fighting. Although I agree with Popplio ending up Water/Fighting, I’m not sold on the idea that we’ll get a Fire/Ground combo; you’ll notice that icon3 is ground and it comes before fire, not after. There’s a possibility that GameFreak has gone the trolling route and will ultimately make Rowlet’s evolution Grass/Ground. As you can see to the right, photo courtesy of Beth Ruggiero, burrowing owls exist and would make sense. If that were the case we’d have a pure Fire-type line with Litten.

Now all that’s left is for us to hear your comments and tell us what you think about all this!

<3 PJ

FEATURED DISCUSSION: Romance in Pokémon Games

Supporters

Help support our work by becoming a Patron on Patreon! Swadloon Platoon members and above will be added to our site supporters list!

371 thoughts on “RUMOR: Typings of the Pokémon Sun & Moon Stater Evolutions LEAKED?!”

  1. I prefer pure fire type litten than a fire/ground so I hope that the ground type is just there for rowlett or for some other random pokemon as for the water/fighting popplio kind of makes sense if you think about it

    Reply
  2. All anger aside, I just hope the Starter’s final evolutions are designed well. I can care less as this point about the Starter’s types. I love Popplio and I don’t want Ken to fuck him up. I don’t want a druken seal that can barely stand up on a circus ball as a final design. I would love to have it remain on it’s belly like Popplio.

    Reply
  3. If anything I think the next Pokemon they plan on revealing on the website will be fire and ground types. I doubt that whoever’s programming the website knows the type of information yet.

    Reply
    • If they are programming a site for an official source, i should hope they know at least what they are setting up for… You are aware that there are documents that can legally get you into trouble if you reveal classified info from a company, right? I had to sign one for both of the places i worked at when i was working… They might KNOW the info, but if they say it, they’ll land their butts in big trouble. Is it worth getting fired, fined, both, or worse to reveal the types of creature’s attributes of a fictional nature?

      Reply
      • I don’t think you understood my original post. I doubt the website programmers even know the typing of the starter’s final evolutions

        Reply
          • Yeah but maybe Gamefreak never told them …… its not like anyone was ever supposed to see these two icons. They didn’t specifically leave these as a hint for us or anything….

          • …. ok. 60% it’s definitely more than 50. It was found on a page only for the starters… on the official site. If the typings upsets you that much, you might as well be prepared yourself to be upset when these turn out right.. I mean.. “if”.. ?

          • you still can’t just decide a number – this could mean something and it could mean nothing and you and I have no idea. Thats it.

          • I can… and I did.
            To say it could mean something or nothing is exactly what I said. You just put percents on it too!
            You don’t understand statistics and probability.
            You are saying.. 50..50.. in words
            I am saying ..60…40.. at least. in numbers
            The fact if where it was found and how definitely increases the chances of it correlating to the starters.
            This is Widely excepted… just go look at the new post.
            Being delusional won’t change anything

          • *Bye
            Uneducated? I just explained what I meant in layman’s terms. Meaning it couldn’t get any simpler. But I will try, for you.
            To say “it could mean something.. it could mean nothing”
            Which you Did.
            Is the equivalent of saying there’s a 50/50 chance in percents.
            So I added the Fact of Where it was found and How it was found to the equation..
            Stating that this makes the probability of these being the correct typings more likely.
            Which from a scientific standpoint.. it does.
            Increasing it to 60/40 At Least.. if not more.
            60+40=100
            So 10 had to leave the 50 side of it being less likely.
            Meaning there is more chance for these types to be correct.
            Yet.. with 40% still left for it to be wrong.. it’s still a nice size probability you are correct.
            Yet. If we are going based on our feelings only, and not math and science. I would say 90% it’s correct, you would say… “what are you talking about, that makes no sense at all, you’re wrong” most likely. ? . Any questions?

          • We’re not friends.
            This is exactly how math works once you leave middle school.
            It’s called statistics and probability. .. google it.
            There are also X’s and Y’s.. etc.
            Bye Felicia.

          • Normally I just ignore trolls because I just end up becoming a mean person, but you’ve been oddly persistent.
            Statistics, by definition, is a numeric representation of data. Data must be collected and WE HAVE NO DATA FROM ANYWHERE. We have a couple images that may or may not mean something. Also, saying that there are two options (may or may not…) does not imply 50/50. It means that we just don’t know anything. You can’t just create probabilities you think sound reasonable. You literally need to go back to every Pokemon website and see how often hidden data correlated with unrevealed information and then analyze that data before you start throwing numbers at people expecting them to take it seriously.

  4. So why would they put the typing icons in and not the Pokemon designs? Are they somewhere hidden on the site?

    Have GF just not given them the designs but let slip the typing?

    Are GF stupid? Is the fandom overreacting (as always)? Do people get paid to make rumours and push theories?

    Stay tuned for answers to these very important questions.

    Reply
    • Let slip the typings.

      However while I do see the logic in the theory, I’m not sure that the two types relate to the starters. There’s nothing in the file names that say that the icons are for the starters.

      Apparently the page they’re on is for all new Pokemon, not just the starters. The reason only the starters are there, is because the starters are the only new Pokemon fully revealed for Sun and Moon.

      This could however just be me wanting my Grass/Flying, Fire/Poison and Water/Fairy trio, but the arguments are valid for both sides.

      Reply
  5. Hmm… I noticed that to.. but the guy to originally discover this said wording made ground go with fire most likely. ..
    Well that would give your rival the advantage if you chose litten after its evolution.. assuming the other boy is your rival.
    But, only make Popplio weaker to Rowlett

    Reply
  6. I think Rowlet changes from Grass/Flying to Grass/Ground, it just seems strange that the Ground type is before Fire.

    Reply
  7. Well for the most part… I believe the typings. Just not sure which goes to who.
    When you think about it….
    Ground, Flying, Frighting
    Fire, Grass, Water
    Sun, Moon, Eclipse.. .
    Tiikis ( or whatever )
    All the things Hawaiin culture represents!

    Too an outsider anyways… they probably feel stronger about Spam nowadays ?

    Reply
  8. PLEASE NO.

    They could be for other Pokemon right??

    Rowllet should not become a Ground type.
    It’s already flying! It makes no sense.

    Same goes for Litten. I will not accept anything other than Fire/Poison or Fire/Dark.

    I don’t want a fighting type starter for the 5th generation in a row, but I’ll accept water/fighting

    Reply
  9. don’t know if u all saw these already? Probably fake but I’m lovin them all, even Popplio’s xD/ It scares me though.

    I love the Blaziken counterpart’s Rowlet’s final. The panther is heaven!

    Reply
      • Ingress is am app by the same company that’s making pokemon go, I believe it’s similar concept. So I’m assuming your info for that 🙂 I had to look it up to find out haha

        Reply
  10. I don’t understand why everyone gets so fussy about the starters. If you don’t like them, just don’t use them. There are plenty of fish in the sea.

    Reply
  11. What I see around are Litten Fans trying to convince themselves and the others that the ground type belongs to Rowlet, Rowlet Fans trying to convince themselves and the others that the ground type belongs to Litten, both fans trying to convince everyone that the types will never be those. Then Popplio waiting silent for his Fighting type that will happen for sure

    I would like that all of you calm down and think a bit about the past.

    In the last two generations the starters became something completly unexpected:

    – Snivy lost hands and foot.

    – Tepig became… well Emboar.

    – Oshawott, a otter, became a sea lion.

    – Chespin became a baloon.

    – Fennekin, the cute golden little fox, was forced to stand on two legs and wear an old dress.

    – Froakie, the so hated starter, become a freaking OP Ninja frog with his tongue as a scarf.

    That said, If you think for some reason that the starters will be an elegant Owl, a monster Tiger and a Clown Sea Lion you are probably wrong, cause GF does not do obvious things. Speculation is good but

    be also ready fot a grass/ground owl, a fire/ground cat and a fighting otter, maybe? Just don’t be obsessed about your idea of what the starters should become, cause at GF they do what they want and you will be disappointed.

    Reply
  12. I have a bit of speculation as to the moon legendary’s typing:
    Ice/Steel

    Hear me out first though. “B-but, fire is–” no, shut up. Listen.
    Whenever I think of daylight/sun, I think warmth, so Fire is obvious. When I think of night time/moon, I feel cold, hence Ice. But what of this Steel eh?

    Look at those things on its wings. It looks sharp, it looks, metallic. And if you think about metal is usually cold.

    Ok, now comment.

    Reply
  13. I’m extremely tired of data miners at this point. They ruined Mega Lati@s, Hoopa and its forms, Volcanion, and Diancie. Now the Sun & Moon starters are subjected to their annoyance. I swear, I usually don’t care for spoilers, but this is getting ridiculous. Here’s my idea/hypothesis on the starters future typing:
    Rowlet: Grass/Flying.
    Litten: Fire/Ground (highly), Fire/Poison (alchemy symbol), or Pure Fire.
    Poppilo: Water/Fighting (again, highly), Water/Normal, or Water/Fairy.

    Reply
  14. Idk why the placement is out of order, but I know GameFreak.

    GF are not going to troll people that choose a starter. At least, not in their typings (maybe in their designs). It makes zero sense to do that.

    Reply
  15. I just hope we get some info in June
    I want to skip the summer after E3 until I get a new desktop so I can get Warcraft Legion on Aug 30
    Then play that until October and Yooka-Laylee
    Then finally at November the glorious Sun and Moon……..which in grand total is 6 months the second we hit June

    Reply

Leave a Comment