Switch Reveal Opinion Extravaganza

It’s Dae here! I promised to write up a bit on my opinion on the Switch reveal, but it turned out to be longer than I expected. Therefore I’ll take this opportunity to publish my first article in a couple of years. Enjoy!

Let’s get the conference out of the way first; it was a poor showing. Live shows are usually a hit or a miss and this one was definitely a miss. Awkward, stiff translations as well as weird presentation of games and holding out on information that would entice customers are among my major gripes. The nice thing is that the Zelda trailer was absolutely amazing and Mario and Xenoblade 2 had a good showings too. But Zelda shouldn’t have been the final ‘one more thing’ surprise, everybody expected it to be a launch title already. Rather, I’d have liked a Metroid tease or something along those lines as a finisher for the show.

The lack of distinct games was also apparent. I guess they didn’t want to show games that weren’t prepared for release, but it didn’t show any confidence that they could produce a steady lineup of games for the Switch. People fear a repeat of the Wii U now, and that could really damage the sales of the console. I also wonder what makes the games so sparse at launch. Nintendo hasn’t released a lot of games in the past two years so I would have assumed they were working on new ones. If that isn’t the case, what were they doing all the time? I guess we’ll have to take a wait and see approach here and time will tell if they announce more games.

The games that have been announced do look pretty good though. Zelda is, of course, breathtaking and had one of the best trailers for a game I’ve ever seen. It really hit all the marks on a checklist of ‘how to make the perfect trailer’. Odyssey looks refreshing and can set itself apart from Galaxy so it won’t have the trouble of being compared to its shadow. The real life city may feel a bit uncanny valley, but I actually like the effect it brings out and luckily there’s a whole slew of different environments. Really looking forward to a more sandbox-style Mario again after the more linear games we’ve had in the past ten years. Splatoon 2 looks fresh, although it looks more like an upgraded port instead of a actual sequel, but then again what is a shooter sequel actually? You can’t innovate a lot except for new weapons, new maps, new strategies and a better online infrastructure. I don’t know if it was confirmed or denied, but I hope for online co-op possibility. Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is also more of a luxury port, but the base game was great and this one will still be lots of fun for parties. I liked the new style of Xenoblade 2 too; it’s a bit different from the previous two but that’s OK in my opinion. Looking forward to hear about those games. 1 2 Switch looks like a fun mini-game collection, but I understand people saying they wanted this to be a pack in title. I don’t expect many people to cough up $50 for it, and I do believe they should have made it a $30 game, but I wouldn’t count on Nintendo rethinking it as a pack-in. I feel like they want to give the impression of it being a top-quality title.

The Switch will launch with only a couple of games, the sparsest it’s ever been for a launch of a console. I think there are a couple of reasons for this. First, you have Nintendo releasing Zelda: BotW. Most who picks up a Switch will pick up Zelda too. That makes for a tough competition from the get-go and games like Skyrim really could suffer from it. That’s why I think some high profile games got delayed last minute when they heard Zelda was making launch. And on the third party side, there a few ports of older games. But then I think, who buys all those ports anyway? Yes, they can make the ports and show ‘confidence’ in the Switch, but neither customers want old ports of uninteresting games they already bought and the publisher won’t make their money back too. It’s sadly a bit of self fulfilling prophecy, as few ports don’t entice customers to buy the console which leads to even fewer ports. But the Switch will all-in-all be a Nintendo and Japanese gaming system, and we just have to have faith in the usual companies to bring over their franchises. In this way I see Switch more as 3DS, with it getting the 3DS like library. With this I mean stuff like Phoenix Wright, Zero Escape… To be successful I think Nintendo just have to push through with being an alternative system, there’s no point to go compete with PS4 and XB1 without bringing some new stuff on the table.

And that brings me to the hardware. I haven’t used the actual hardware itself, but I read many positive impressions. The build quality is great and the looks are top notch. I even find it to have a bit of ‘sex-appeal’. If you search for direct comparison shots between the Switch and Wii U Gamepad, you’ll realize how bad the Gamepad looked and feel like it was made by Fisher-Price. But they did a great job with the Switch. The concept is appealing, and can be demonstrated easily to someone unfamiliar with the console. As a power engineer with some electronics background, I can also tell from all the technical stuff I read that this is the best console they could have built. The processor and graphics card is the most modern one that can power the console for continuous use. Processors in a iPhone 7 or upcoming Galaxy S8 may be faster, but they clock down due to power and heat concerns. The battery is also rather large and takes up a lot of space already, so saying they skimped out on battery is untrue. The battery life might not be a lot, but it’s actually comparable to phones running at 100% load. They also use a lot of modern application like USB C fast charging, Wifi AC, multitouch… Maybe you don’t believe it, but it’s really an impressive piece of tech that is competitive with stuff released today.

We can’t forget about the best parts of the console too: the Joy-Cons. I feel like they are the heart of the console, they are so well designed that the concept of the Switch really shines. Some vendors do have some detachable controllers for a generic tablet, but the from factor, build quality and ease of use are so far ahead that you can really see the ‘Nintendo magic’. Switching (haha, get it?) between docked, portable and table mode is so easy that it gets this wow factor when showing it off to friends. Being able to share a Joy-Con for two players is also nice, even though it doesn’t seem to be the most comfortable thing. But I can assure you, I can pop out my Switch and have some great fun with friends playing Mario Kart 8. The HD Rumble works well too apparently, and I think Nintendo can find some good applications for its use in games. Having some motions controls built in while functioning as traditional controllers is what makes this console combine the best of both worlds. A 20 hour battery life isn’t too shabby either, and you can easily recharge the battery when you dock the console.

This all reflects on the price too, which is indeed a bit expensive. $80 for a pair of Joy-Cons is steep, and far above a regular PS4 or Xbox One controller. Yes, you technically get two, but you’ll be buying them in pairs, because who wants a single lonely Joy-Con? I suspect many games to require a pair of Joy-Cons too, even though I don’t know if it’s possible to connect four pairs of Joy-Con if some game featured four player local multiplayer (Smash Bros?). They feature lots of tech and game companies always want to make money on accesories, but I think it would have been better if they priced it $10 to $15 lowers to reduce the sticker shock effect. The other accessories are expensive too, the Pro Controller is the definitive controller for couch gaming, but it comes with a definitive price as well. Buying extra Joy-Cons don’t even give the same colour straps, which can be bought for $8 seperately. And if you want an extra grip and be able to charge your controllers, which you can’t do with the included grip, it’ll cost you an extra $30. Granted, including it in the box would have upped the box price with another $15. If you want a ‘starters pack’ for new Switch users, you can feel nickel-and-dimed due to the high accessory costs. I wish Nintendo can first address those prices if it seems that it is a barrier to entry.

As for the box itself, I feel the $299 is still a fair price. Based on what I read, I already expected that $249 would be a tough target to reach. $299 is actually reasonable if you know what’s inside and how much things cost in manufacturing, R&D costs, distribution, retail and not to mention bad exchange rate and taxes in Europe. I believe that Nintendo still makes less profit in Europe per console sold, since people always forget that doing business in general is more expensive here due to wages, business taxes and buildings. The real question is actually value sided. It’s not: ‘Is this a fair price to charge’, but: ‘Do I feel like this is a fair price to me’. Nintendo will have to do a good job in selling value to the consumer and needs a clear messaging what it’s actually selling. In that I feel that a comparison with PS4 and generic tablets is not the way to go. Yes, the PS4 is comparable in price and more powerful, but as long as the Switch offers distinctly different features, people may still get enticed to buy. We’ll see if this works out, but I’m not the one who is calling this out as a flop already.

As for myself, I still believe in the Switch and even did save up enough the past two years to go on a crazy shopping splurge. I pre-ordered the Grey console, got the Pro Controllers, the Red/Blue Joy-Cons, the Charging Grip and an extra case. I really felt like that at some point in the future, I would have bought it anyway to play my favorite Nintendo games and therefore it doesn’t matter to me if I buy it sooner. I also want the definitive edition of Zelda, and being able to transport it between my dorm and home is a really big plus to me. I really look forward to most of the first party games that are announced, even though not many details have come out already. The conference damped my enthusiasm a bit, but I think it will be on full fire again closer to March 3rd. I’ll do a technical review of the Switch in six weeks when I get my hands on one, so look forward to reading it here!

This thing has gotten really long now, and I didn’t even touch on all the aspects of the Switch, but I need to wrap up here. If you’d like to have my opinion on an untouched subject, just ask in the comments. I’ll still check them regularly, even though I may not be an active writer anymore 🙂 I’d love to hear your opinion on the Switch too. Are you buying at launch? Holding out a bit? Or have even become uninterested? What do you think of the price? What games can entice you to buy? Tell me in the comments!

Enjoy and you’ll hear back from me when I get my Switch!

~Daedardus~

Supporters

Help support our work by becoming a Patron on Patreon! Swadloon Platoon members and above will be added to our site supporters list!

3,671 thoughts on “Switch Reveal Opinion Extravaganza”

  1. Does anyone have a moment where they can’t decide on who’s their favorite Pokemon? I’m now stuck between Scizor, Blaziken, Infernape, and (recently) Sceptile as my favorite.

    Reply
          • Solid Typing Bulk, and Dragon Dance and Mold Breaker stops Water Absorb

            normally Garchomp is my gyara blocker but this was one of those instances where it ran Ice Fang

          • That doesn’t equate OP though?
            if you suck and can’t beat something then that isn’t OP. You’re just a bad player

          • Maybe for a mono-ground team. But thats the risk you take playing mono-type. In standard play it can be dealt with relatively easily.

          • my point, I only have one legit water counter in my arsenal and that’s Nidoking (i say counter not wall because plenty of Water/Grounds take water moves but not enough to take others out)

          • ehh Quagsre is literally just nothing but spamming Recover and i don’t want to win that way (unless i want to watch the other struggle) but Seismitoad’s been very very loyal to me and i wouldn’t give him up for anything

            Did i ever show you this match where this guy stalled with Florges and in the very end i crippled his jirachi with Arcanine and just kept switching in and out with torkoal to arcanine building intimidates

          • Like I said it’s the risk you take playing Mono-Type. Mega Gyarados isn’t OP is just does well against Types it’s super effective against, I.e. Ground Type.

          • It’s not easy to beat, it’s a good Pokémon
            You can use pheromosa,Bulu,will-o-wisp,Mega scizor. So it’s not impossible.
            Besides you could use this argument for every Pokémon.

          • you’re the first person I’ve heard saying that.

            Mega gyarados is a good Pokémon, but it’s really not broken at all and it’s on par with other megas. Plus with all these Fairies and Bug types this gen, it’s pretty easy to beat

    • Wow you fought against the most common type game. What are the odds. High. So its actually reasonable. But you cant probably hear me on the high horse, so here’s your bad luck sticker. You are #1 in bad luck!

      Reply
    • listen here, this is your problem, you don’t have to prove anything to anyone, maybe thats why you’re so angry all the time, you need to calm down, I can feel the stress coming off of you from here.

      Reply
    • I know it’s ironic because I’m criticizing you, and this post is about criticism, but…
      I find it more helpful to, instead of laughing in someone’s face as they explain their opinion, be someone respectful and at the very least listen.
      If I was trying to help someone, and they started laughing at me as I was explaining, I would walk away immediately. It’s pretty rude

      Reply
      • Umm…..what the HECK are you talking about? I have no idea what you mean, I’m sorry but whatever it is, I feel like it’s criticism towards me.

        Reply
  2. Since i need to unwind i need some ideas for Normal Types
    and so far after a stem cell i try my hand at a Kangaroo

    Dojoey
    Normal/Fighting
    Scrappy PKM
    Scrappy/Hustle HA: Lead Foot (increases the damage of kicking moves by 20%)
    a medium sized wallaby Pokemon with a bright orange coloration it has thick toned thighs and legs and very long feet, its arms are fairly short but they’re shaped like mittens, its tail and ears are triangular and is crooked has a pair of red stripes, they have a tuft of red hair on their heads and a black snout
    “Dojoey are extremely stubborn trying to pick fights with others, they run at high speeds to burn off excessive energy”

    and soon after they become the mighty Kickaroo!
    Kickaroo
    Normal/Fighting (though considering Dark/Fighting)
    Kickboxing PKM
    Scrappy/Sheer Force HA: Lead Foot
    A taller and much more aggressive looking Kangaroo Pokemon with a darker orange skin and longer legs and feet, their feet are equipped with three long red toeclaws their mitten fists have red claws, they have a large white X mark on their tan belly (females have a line to show a pouch) their eyes have a series of scar like markings and a single fang sticking out of their mouth, and wild red hair
    “These Pokemon are extremely pugnacious that incorporate kicking, punching and biting into its fighting style, with their extremely powerful legs they can deliver a kick that could send a car flying 30 meters into the air”

    Reply
  3. I think once Bank gets a set date for release I’ll go back into my Omega Ruby and get things set up for transfer. It’ll be really weird going into that old engine, but it should be interetsing as well lol

    Reply
  4. Yo I need some assistance for Fakémon

    So, at least in Scotland and England, more emphasis is placed on the national flower than most places. So for my UK based region, I decided to make a Pokémon for each regional flower, as well as just making a regional variant of Roserade because it’s a perfectly fine Rose Pokémon. So I’ve got

    Thisterax Line (masculine counterpart to Roserade Line)
    Roserade Line
    Carniflora Line (daffodil/crocodile hybrid, the flower of Wales)

    So I just need help with my shamrock Pokémon. I was thinking either a literal shamrock (Grass/Rock), a Leprechaun/shamrock hybrid (Grass/Fairy), or because Grass and Water are tied for most Pokémon in my region, a Fairy leprechaun with a shamrock theme/picks up shamrocks/has a symbiotic relationship with shamrocks

    Any suggestions?

    Reply
  5. I’ve figured out my region (for the most part)
    The region itself will be based on Ireland, but with some Norway elements incorporated into the region. Dunno about the name for it quite yet.

    Reply
  6. I had a really vivid dream last night relating to Pokemon – one of the first occurrences of this for me in a very long time. It almost felt real to me when I was there. I even remember myself going to PokeJungle and seeing the article about it! Anyway, what I remember is the reveal of two new Pokemon games during some special event later this year. May have been a Nintendo Direct, may have been its own separate event. Basically, the titles were not “remakes” of Diamond and Pearl but “reimaginings”, using a modified Sun and Moon engine with much better graphics. I remember something about “black” Gen 2 Pokemon – what may have been some kind of Alolan Form situation with mutations or something. The names of the games were something the lines of Pokemon Plurality and Pokemon Celestia – those are probably not accurate but the main point is that they did not include Diamond and Pearl in the names. I remember a shot of the trainer riding a Pokemon or something towards a very aggressive Dialga or Palkia. That was my dream, or at least what I still recall of it.

    Reply
    • Man….can I just say how much I love pre release seasons for Pokemon games? There’s so much excitement in the air and the unknown is so interesting. I can’t wait for Stars to get revealed. I hope it’s not just a port of Sun and Moon. I want a new game(s). Something that moves the story of SuMo along or even connects it to the other games more lol

      Reply
    • This sounds like a tad bit like my dream of Eeveelutions for Sun and Moon I came the Pokémon main site and saw A Ground, Poison, and Steel trio underneath the trainers it looked soooo cool!

      Reply
    • Oh and I almost forgot. I think I’d really like a re imagining of DP rather than a near cut and dry remake of them. I found DP dreadful to get through so if they revamp it and make it a bit different (i.e. more palatable to get through) Then I’d be all for it. I really hope that when/if they remake DP they add more variety to the dex. The original dex had like 3 lines of fire types……It was awful…..on top of that they need to make Mt.Coronet less of a trudge to get through.

      Reply
    • Maybe your a seer and you don’t even know it!? Quick let’s build this man a shrine and worship him till he predicts something wrong and then we’ll riot! because you may ask… wynaut?

      Reply
    • You might have predicted the future :0

      There was this one dream that I had one time when it was when Sylveon’s typing wasn’t revealed yet. Apparently, in this dream, Sylveon was a new type, the “Equal” type, along with Xerneas. It was some type that balanced out all the types. And, strangely enough, Sylveon was a new type that balanced out dragons, and Xerneas was that same type.

      Reply
  7. Lol I got my shiny morelull in 10 eggs. All I need now is Mimikyu and I will have a shiny version of every fairy pokemon released (Minus legends that you cant get anyways)

    Reply
  8. I now have all my Ice types for my region figured out:

    Water/Ice Reindeer (last evolution for starter)
    2 stage Flying/Ice Snowy Owl line
    Ice Sabertooth that turns into a Ice/Dark type
    Ice Husk Ox
    Fire/Ice Mecha/Gundam pseudo line
    Ice/Dragon legendary that’s based on the Black Tortoise of the 4 symbols of Chinese constellations

    Reply
  9. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a4eafd5b63deac79105649836cc6f9c1e2c85c9daa705a9fffebd74a6b2adf2.png I know you 7 think I’m mentally challenged, weird, for some reason scary (thanks for upsetting me), but I’m not, I’m a regular person who likes to be random. I’m actually quite a bit offended and I don’t even know what to think anymore. Quitting is more and more a better option, since nobody here seems to be trustable anymore. Sorry but I can’t be in a place where people think I’m mentally challenged and seem to up vote criticism comments more than at least trying to like what i od.

    Reply
  10. I seriously cannot get into Majora’s Mask, no matter how hard I try. The way they organized the game is completely nonsensical to me and I just can’t wrap my head around it. I want to have fun, but it’s not that easy. It’s the only Zelda game I’ve ever really disliked…

    Reply

Leave a Comment