X & Y Reviews and Pokémon Bank Info

The first reviews for Pokémon X&Y are being put online. We’ll be updating this post throughout the day to keep track of the games and what new reviews there are for you to read. Let’s get started!

Reviews

  • Mashable: “‘Pokémon X’ and ‘Y’ Are Polished But Play It Too Safe”
    • The much-anticipated 3DS addition to the Pokémon series will not disappoint fans of the franchise. 3D has been a long time coming, and I’m glad it turned out so well. While the battles are as fun as ever, I wish developers would had taken more risks with its structure and story. Still, whether you just want to casually battle friends or enter tournaments, Pokémon X and Y will give you enough to chew on for many, many hours of fun.
  • IGN: “Pokemon X and Y Review: A Mega Evolution” (9/10)
    • “Every so often, evolution takes a significant leap. Pokemon X and Y is smarter, better, and faster than its predecessors, but it’s the impressive online social features and fantastic new 3D look that make the latest game in the 15-year-old RPG series amazing. As long as you’re within the range of Wi-Fi, you’re never alone in Pokemon X and Y, and we finally have the tools to express ourselves over the course of this 35-hour adventure.”
  • GameInformer: “Seeing Pokemon From a New Angle” (8.75/10)
    • “Pokémon hasn’t made a concerted effort to step outside of its comfort zone ever since it first released in Japan in 1996 – and for good reason. It found its hook nearly 20 years ago and has held on firm for better and worse. In this way, changing things in Pokémon presents a certain degree of uncomfortable risk. X & Y offer no significant changes in direction to the Pokémon series, but this is the most drastic step the series has ever taken. “
  • Digital Spy: “‘Pokemon X’ review (3DS): As engaging and addictive as ever”
    • “Pokemon X and accompanying game Pokemon Y represent what is perhaps the biggest evolution of the Pokemon series since it debuted to a huge following in the mid-nineties.
      Receiving a graphical overhaul, new ways to connect, customisation options and Mega Evolutions, not to mention a wealth of new Pokemon to catch, the games are packed with first-time features and fresh new ideas.At its core, however, Pokemon X doesn’t stray too far from the original ‘gotta catch ’em all’ concept that has made the series so addictive and engaging.”

Still waiting on the outright negative review!

Pokemon Bank

In other news, it has been confirmed that Pokemon Bank will be released in the US  on December 27th, 2013 with a yearly fee of $4.99 ! You do get one free month of the service, however, and only need to start paying past the 30 day trial. It has also been shown that items do not transfer with the Pokemon.

<3 PJ

Featured Thread: Canada’s Largest Pokémon Gathering by Freeduck

Supporters

Help support our work by becoming a Patron on Patreon! Swadloon Platoon members and above will be added to our site supporters list!

6,127 thoughts on “X & Y Reviews and Pokémon Bank Info”

  1. i was sad that they said that the story was basic any way pokemon is for kids not meaning adults cant like any way i judge it my self

    Reply
  2. I’m happy because the reviewer basically said what I was hoping for. Every reviewer always says they need to change the story to make it more interesting and get rid of the 8 gym leader formula, but honestly I love the simple story and if they changed the formula too much then it wouldn’t be pokemon any more.
    And since the reviewer said the game was tons of fun, I’m stoked.

    Reply
  3. Just read the Mashable review. Story leaves a lot to be desired apparently. Will find out for myself in a week, but to be honest, it was going to be very hard to top B/W’s story.

    Reply
    • I always felt like B/w’s story was kind of irritating. Recently they’ve put more and more story into these games, but I sort of preferred when I could progress through the game and collect badges and find new areas, and I didn’t feel like I had to stop every 2 seconds to beat a cave filled with Team Plasma grunts or backtrack all the way across the fucking game just for the story. It sort of felt like the focused more on creating a cools tory with that gen, then they did gameplay. That’s why while the story was pretty cool when it didn’t really interrupt your gameplay, I felt the gameplay suffered anyway.

      Reply
      • i tend to agree with this. I mean there’s the “story” involving the evil team, and the “stories” involving the legendaries, which don’t necessarily have to be the same story, so we’ll see. I’d rather gameplay be better because that’s going to last longer than the story

        Reply
      • Hmm, I’m honestly not the biggest fan of Gen 5, but the one thing I loved was the story. From the mystery of N, to Ghetsis’ true intentions, to N’s Castle and the Pokemon League, N defeating Alder, and you having to catch the legendary to advance the plot. Then you get the opportunity to face your legendary against N’s. I loved it lol.

        Reply
  4. Where i live, in Argentina, Pokemon x and y will come on the 25th of october, i will have to wait two weeks more than the rest of the world 🙁

    Reply
  5. Kind of a bad review. We were told it was fun but it didn’t have much story to it? Does that make it good still? Bad? Mediocre? This leaves a lot out in the open.

    Reply
  6. Yeah that’s the problem with reviews. Reviewers usually take the side of “It was great!” or “It was pretty bad”.
    Opinions are like Pokéballs, everyone’s got ’em.

    Reply
    • I was literally thinking about how mega’s and fairies are not “playing it safe” after I read the article. Amen to that.

      Reply
    • I think they meant story wise and structure. Not that i’m complaining. I like the structure of the Pokemon games. Without it, it wouldn’t be Pokemon anymore, just another RPG.

      Reply
    • Between the Fairy type, Mega Evolutions, refocusing the story away from “being the very best”/beating gym leaders/the Elite Four and onto researching evolution, Super Training, Pokemon-Amie, the competitive infrastructure improvements, character customization, the new and improved Dream World, and the 3d graphics, this game seriously looks like the most adventurous Pokemon title since GSC.
      The Mashable reviewer isn’t really a Pokemon fan. She even mentioned that she hasn’t played Pokemon in years, so she’s hardly the most qualified to review the game. I wouldn’t want an FPS lover who only likes action games to review an RPG, and vice versa. I don’t know why Mashable didn’t get a review from someone who’s into Pokemon.

      Reply
  7. I feel like a reviewer will leak one Pokemon today >.> It will probably be the Starter Final Evo’s, like they don’t know we all know about them. *Prays to Arceus for Ooroto at last*

    Reply
  8. According to the review, Pokémon X and Y are “brimming with new Pokémon”!
    The reviewer says he/she found 5 to 8 new Pokémon each route.

    Reply
    • I think she meant new from route-to-route, as in 5 to 8 she had not seen in the game yet (versus brand new to the generation itself).

      Reply
        • Yes – like first route she saw 5 different kinds of pokemon, second route, 6 additional different pokemon, and so on. Sort of like, instead of some of the older games, like Black and White where you have very limited options (such as only patrat, lilipup, and purloin for a while).

          Reply
    • I thought that at first. But i think they are just talking about the diversity of Pokemon available. i.e there are different kinds of Pokemon available in each area

      Reply
      • Well, at least he/she said it brimming with NEW Pokémon. If new Pokémon means Kalos Pokémon. I hope for at least 90+ new Pokémon this Gen.

        Reply
  9. I don’t mind if the story is not outstanding. That is just a bonus for me, on top of catching and training them all. As long as the visuals are great, the Pokemon are creative and well-designed, and the battling system stays relatively the same, there should be no complaining. It’s a Pokemon game, what more could you ask for?

    Reply
  10. I am a little disappointed with the fact that the games won’t have a very good story…. Black and White had a very good story and i found the villanous team amazing. according to the review, team flare is only a “stand in”. But im still excited to see for myself. 😀

    Reply
    • Since the reviewer hasn’t played for years, he/she probably hasn’t met Team Plasma and is comparing Team Flare with one of the older teams (Aqua, Magma, Rocket and Galactic). He/she probably didn’t play through and experience the story of BW and B2W2. I’m guessing the story would be similar to the story of Gen 5.

      Reply
  11. Honeslty I was already prepared for a non outstanding story, Masuda did say in an interview that the game’s focus is the bond between you and your friends. I definitely don’t mind this as long as I have a lot to do before and after the story comes to it’s conclusion.

    Reply
  12. Y’know, if that last badge is really Ice-type, we have seen eff all Ice types so far. I can only assume there will be tons just before the end of the game.

    Reply
  13. I wish big publications like Mashable would hire competent reviewers. I mean, they’re kinda pathetic as far as game criticism goes but this is absolutely dreadful by even their standards.

    For example: “I wish developers would had taken more risks with the story” – I’d love to know what she thinks would be a better system, but I don’t because it’s just a throwaway comment that means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to anyone. It’s not backed up at all. If I wanted baseless personal opinions like that I’d check Twitter next Saturday.

    Reply
    • “The variety of terrain, from rolling fields to rivers to rocky mountain passes only traversable via a Rhydon mount, keeps every moment outdoors fresh.”

      …

      RHYHORN! Seriously people, is it that hard? This is at least the second time this has happened!

      Reply
      • I’m not asking her to reveal anything, but if you make a negative point about something in a review it’s good practice to back it up. Otherwise it’s lazy journalism.

        She didn’t even have to give specific examples, but if she really wishes the developers would take more risks with the story then she’s not spoiling anything by offering a perspective or idea for a solution – I mean, that’s what she’s getting paid for!

        There’s more value in an informed opinion on a game’s strengths and weaknesses than simply saying the story’s weak and leaving it at that. Anyone can do that.

        Reply

Leave a Comment