Pokémon Sun & Moon Follow-Up Coming to Nintendo Switch

by

EuroGamer writer Tom Phillips claims to have been told classified Nintendo information about the follow-up to the recently launched Pokémon Sun & Moon… and it won’t be a run-of-the-mill third version. The new game, codenamed Pokémon Stars, will be launching on the brand new Nintendo Switch console in summer 2017 or later.

Here are a few of the details:

  • Brand-new Pokémon not found in Sun & Moon
  • ‘Trading’ via Pokémon Box
  • Switch-exclusive features
  • Improved graphics

What do you think? This could be the first console version of the main series, but some fans may feel disappointed if there are exclusive Pokémon that require use of a totally different console.

It all comes together, doesn’t it?

FEATURED DISCUSSION: All Sun and Moon QR codes

Supporters

Nick F

Smearg

Foil Island

Conglome NERD

alcremie sundae

Radiant Blutle

Zachery

Dragoniteo

Austin John Plays

Help support our work by becoming a Patron on Patreon! Swadloon Platoon members and above will be added to our site supporters list!

282 thoughts on “Pokémon Sun & Moon Follow-Up Coming to Nintendo Switch”

  3. Nooooo! Another reason to buy the Switch. I on’t want to! But if I want access to new Mario Kart tracks and characters, the new Mario game and now this new Pokemon game, I must waste hundreds of dollars on it! My poor Wii-U. I want those games but I have to buy a new system in order to have access! UUUUGH! Also, do you know yet if the Pokemon in that version area able to be transported to Sun and Moon?

    Reply

  6. Still waiting for my games to be delivered. Since I had to work today I figured it’ll just order on Amazon Prime and it’ll be here by the time I get home from work. I’m starting Moon first cause it’s night now when I get home around 6:00 pm. Then tomorrow morning I start Sun. What does everyone think of the games so far?

    Reply

    • I’m personally doubting it. I don’t think Pokémon is coming to Switch this early because GF wanted it. I think Nintendo finally decided they had to make GF do what was good for Nintendo and told them they need an exclusive Pokémon game year 1.

      Reply

      • This honestly sounds like a fake rumor, but I guess they’re a trustworthy source? If it helps out the switch though, I guess I can’t be mad. I want Nintendo’s home consoles to do well

        Reply

  12. Yeah, I’m not going to hold my breath on this and say that its either a false rumor, or full of half truths. From a business perspective this seems like a horrible idea. At best this would give them about 9 months to get out a new pokemon game on a console that has not been proven successful and is ultimately more of a home console then a handheld given both rumors about its specs and general observation. We have no idea of the 3DS having any connectivity with the Switch which would mean at beast it would have pokemon bank to transfer over pokemon, but otherwise it would lead to a large split in the user base.

    That, and I’ll be honest, and feel free to call me crazy, but I don’t see the switch replacing handheld gaming. Its rumored battery life is to low, the chips run hot on it which would be a concern as a handheld, its not nearly as durable as a handheld has to be, and honestly it seems like its too powerful for handheld dev’s to work with affordably.

    Reply

    • Not judging. Ultimately we’re all allowed to feel how we want. But I’ll get to work on your tin foil hat.

      But from a business perspective from Nintendo’s perspective, there is literally nothing better for the Switch than a main line Pokémon game.

      Reply

      • Ah lovely, shutting down someone’s argument by saying they have a tinfoil hat.

        And I disagree. Yes the switch will sell well in theory if their’s a main series pokemon game on it, but that’s not saying much. If you put virtually anything pokemon on the switch it would sell. On the other hand though it doesn’t change the fact that the console is still being marketed as a home console, and generally every game and dev we’ve heard is working on the switch are focusing on console games, not handhelds. If anything it could be very likely that the Switches development costs are simply to high for handheld developers.

        Again I’ll happily be proven wrong, but I do question the legitimacy of any rumor, especially one around technology that hasn’t even proven to be successful yet and is planning to release a port of a game that won’t even be a year old if this were to be true that promises everything that people wanted to hear.

        Reply

        • lol Ok my B. Let me break down my thoughts then. You didn’t really offer up anything other than a refusal of belief in the first comment. Even though EuroGamer literally doesn’t post rumors. This a legit leak. They leaked the general Switch design.

          And then you said how it doesn’t make business sense. Which I guess MAYBE for GF it might not? Since they already have a 3DS engine so they could see higher returns by just releasing the third version for it. But they gotta make an engine for Switch at some point. So why not start with an enhanced third version of what looks to be two of their best selling Pokémon games maybe ever.

          And then you start insisting that the Switch won’t / can’t act as both the Wii U’s and 3DS’ successor even though Nintendo has been expressing a desire to consolidate them into one for literally years now. And the console has been announced. And your denying its purpose.

          Just feels like a complete denial of reality.

          Reply

          • Your initial point was that putting pokemon on a gaming console will make money. I agreed with you on that. I simply said that anything pokemon related would make money. As for Eurogamer’s leaks, yeah they have a good track record, I won’t deny that. At the same time though I am a bit skeptical about their information, as you should be with any leak or rumor. And yes this is a rumor until stated by GF or Nintendo. Pretty much their clam, reading through the article, pretty much claims that the only clear evidence for it is the Pikipek model, saying it was a higher resolution version of the model, which really doesn’t mean much of anything.

            And yes, if Nintendo’s plan is to merge both their console and handheld lines into a single device, which could easily backfire as I mentioned due to handheld dev’s simply not being able to afford to develop for it, getting started on a new pokemon game would make sense. The issue I have though is in its timing. Probably the fastest case we’ve scene of a game being re-released on better hard ware was with the Last of Us on ps3 to ps4, having about a 13 month window between the two. The thing is though that the game was basically given an HD upgrade and very little had to be changed in terms of gameplay. Going from the 3DS to the switch seem’s like a much bigger jump, and while yes we know now that the game’s a huge success, or liekly will be, it also run’s the gambit of burning a lot of people feeling like they were cheated for buying the incomplete 3ds version and not holding out for the true version on the switch, like people did feel when they kept on pushing back Breath of the Wild and not initially telling people that it was planned to come to the Switch.

            And yes, I stand by what I say there that combining the two would be a bad idea. For one, please give me any source that has said that Nintendo has ever stated they wanted to consolidate their markets. I’ve heard plenty of fans and critics desire this, but never have I seen any statement from Nintendo Saying this. As well, you seem to be in the mindset that the portability of the switch instantly makes it the new handheld, and that its not simply an additional feature to it. To me that’s like saying a cellphone’s a handheld gaming console because its portable and can fit into your picket and can play games. It certainly can do those things, but it doesn’t really have the battery life to support playing games constantly and the fact that a phone can play games is more of a fun feature then a major selling point.

            Look I fully do see that the Switch is replacing the Wii U as a homeconsole, and it very well might be replacing the 3DS as well, but I do question that it would. I do question that a device that is expected to appeal to AAA dev’s, which it is, will also be affordable for AA dev’s to make games for and compete in the market with it. I do question that they would release what is held as a better version of the game a mere nine months after the release of these games given that our only reason to believe it is a Rumor from a site that has a good track record. I do question if the Switch will even prove successful given how little we really do know about it, and that there are some suspected design flaws with it already.

            But I’m open minded about it as well. I’m happy to be proved wrong. I want to see these games in HD graphics. I want to see the switch be made of some insanely strong plastic and glass to make up for any falls the thing could have. I want to see Nintendo come out and say that they will advertise games as being for Switch home vs. Switch handheld or something so that people can set their expectation’s correctly to the game their playing and know how its best to experience it. But right now we know nothing. So please, and I’m honestly trying to be sincere here. Let’s not let this devolve into us saying that the other side is in denial and wearing tinfoil hats. We’ve both reached our own conclusions based on what we think is right, and time will tell how things play out. If these rumor’s are true, then I’ll be happy, and if not, then I won’t be surprised.

            Or if you want it in a shorter sentence, I’m not denying reality. I’m just assuming its false until proven true, and I’ll be happy to see if its true later.

          • Ok so I read it all. But this is all I have as a response: I’ve followed GoNintendo for years. They post every little snippet of interviews all the major heads of Nintendo do. There have been countless comments about how they desire to consolidate their hardware. They even finished building an entire new building to consolidate their software efforts 2-3 years ago. I’m not going to dig up countless articles just to prove that point. It’s a thing. If they release a new handheld it’ll basically be a weaker Switch. It won’t be a wholly separate device.

          • And I wouldn’t ask you to dig up entire articles. Just simply clarify the point. I’ve followed them for years as well and simply hadn’t hard them ever speak of this before, which is why I questioned the statement. And yeah I did figure if they do release a more proper handheld, it would be somethings similar to the switch with weaker hardware.

            But thank you for reading everything. I tend to have a habit of going a bit deep with it comes to debating an issue, mostly because I want to be proven wrong by the end of it, or at least find some sort of common ground of an agreement. I see your points and I can honestly say that I could see them trying to merge their markets, as much as I feel that they would be risking, if not destroy a portion of their market in the process, but if anyone could pull it off it would be Nintendo.

            And no worries. I’m sorry if I’m coming across as a jerk or anything as well as I’m really sick and running on about three hours of sleep myself. In any case though let us just be happy that Pokemon is here and take what ever GF gives us next

            That, and at least give us a port of Pokken for the Switch with the new character’s in it. I’ll happily wait for you to release it much later if it means we can get M-Empoleon into the game.

          • Haha yea I typically get really involved in debates too. So I totally understand. But when I’m tired I get annoyed that people don’t immediately see my line of thinking. Which really just means I should abstain from trying to be opinionated until I wake up lmao

            But as far as destroying a portion of their market: I think the DS/Wii situation was a flash in the pan. Likely to never happen again. I think they’re more likely to see more success by consolidating due to having so many fans. But often times their fans don’t buy both their hardware so it creates a divide. I think from just Nintendo fans they’re guaranteed to do good numbers. Plus with less-to-no software droughts they’ll keep brand awareness higher and more sales on each software release, which is where the real money is. And then throw in quality 3rd party support and customers that come with that? I think it has hoesntly way more potential than a 3DS2 and WiiU2 combined. But that’s all speculation till we see what happens.

          • From that perspective I agree, though honestly I simply meant handheld dev’s might suffer, not consumers. I’ve always been of the opinion that Console spec’s really only matter to the dev’s, and by making a console that doesn’t give a good way to include them in with the usual home console dev’s, they could be forced to go fully to mobile, or simply go out of business. But we’ll see with time.

          • Also I’m sorry for coming across aggressive and dismissive. This is not a valid excuse of behavior, but I’m not running on much sleep right now and so I’m being snippy.

  14. I played for a couple hours last night before I went to bed and haven’t gotten that far yet. Current thoughts:

    -The game looks beautiful. Pokémon has never felt so immersive.
    -Beginning is very slow. So many cutscenes and tutorials.
    -Annoying lag after wild battles.
    -Menus are nice and easy to navigate ESPECIALLY the PC. I love how they’ve arranged it this time around.
    -Love the music.
    -Maybe it’s just that I’ve got a slow team and not much type coverage to work with, but I had to use SO MANY potions throughout the trainer school. Especially during the teacher battle. I’ve got a Munchlax that I SRd for like half an hour to get Adament, and a Rowlet which I didn’t bother to SR for…and it’s Bold. I could tell its Attack stat was hurting before I even decided to check up on what nature it had.
    -All the characters have SO MUCH MORE personality than anyone from X & Y.

    Aside from some nit picky complaints, I am really enjoying things so far 🙂

    Reply

        • I think you all mean MEGA Dragonite, whatever the typing. If Dragonite doesn’t get a mega like it’s counterparts and instead gets the short of the stick with a regional variant, I’m gonna be incredibly angry.

          Reply

          • Bruh. Azumaril is really good competitively. If Dragonite got a Fairy/Water Alolan form and had a competitive ability, that sucker would see a lot of use.

            But I’m also down for a Mega. haha Dragonite is the only one I really wanna see Genwun love for and GF refuses xD

          • Oh it’s not a question of usability (though anyway I would really detest if it lost the dragon type, I guess I just assumed Water/Fairy was a big NO NO NO HELL NO anyway haha), it’s a question of patterning. I can be a little obsessive when it come to patterns, but I’m the sort of person who thinks every starter and pseudo should get a mega, and crazier I guess, that every starter should get 2 megas like charizard (it would give them an amount of further uniqueness) and that we’re long overdue jynx and banette evos (yes, I want mega/evo splits, don’t tell me mega scyther or mega dusclops wouldn’t be amazing), and who’ll always feel pokémon is just incomplete until we get those (and an eeveelution for every type, obviously).

          • Nooooo, you’re letting GF and their nonsensical bullshit ways win…
            Nah, I kid, it’s probably best to accept things as they are, then you don’t get dissapointed.
            I’m just pining for the day I randomly get control of the franchise and can set things right haha :p .

    • New megas seem inevitable to me. I could see them not bringing back alolan-eqs forms. They like to drop features that people like 😛

      Reply

  17. Due to this, there are many Pokémon that will only appear when you call for an S.O.S. Battle, such as Mareanie. You can also get low level versions of fully evolved Pokémon, like a Salamence when you have an SOS Battle with Bagon in Route 3.
    OH SHIT

    Reply

Leave a Comment