I guess some of them had trouble “forgetting” info to analyze the old leaks, slipped a little and affirmed things they should not know yet (or maybe it’s written there and I don’t know) like the confirmation of accessories being the PokéGEAR or the pokémon following system.

Others did a great job writing, but either wrote too much (this is supposed to be a news article) or too little (and let some info out). I’d also like to point that although bullet system is very useful, it should not be abused.

Keep going guys! And remember that even the ones with lower voting can still learn from the feedbacks and win the games.

May the odds(and the evens) be ever in your favor.

Probably not. We don’t want you guys to figure out who’s who, and giving them a new number lets you focus more on the actual writing instead of the person from the previous challenge.

Nope, this is one of the reasons why… right after magazines not being free/taking up space/poor rainforests.
xD

Will the numbers remain the same?

Otherwise we won’t see whether they change the style to fit the content or stick with something that works for one thing but is awful for another o:

actual*

Excuse my errors. 4 hours sleep. Not good.

I guess it’s a good job you’re not reading the/an actually magazine then? They’re generally written in the same manner. 😉

Yeah, but when its new information like corocoro, I don’t want to read no damn conversation and subjective text. That’s what random articles and the comment sections are good for :B

Seriously though, good show all! The articles were all informative and well written! I thought I would have too few to vote for, but ended up having to leave one of my liked ones out.
Note that I only voted for you if you got pretty much all the info out of the scans. So even if your writing style is fantastic, you have to squeeze every drop of info out of those scans!

Personally a combo between 1 and 11 would be perfect…