<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The rare and elusive TCG post	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/</link>
	<description>Pokémon News, Rumors and Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 21:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Avarule		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-47821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avarule]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-47821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is great! I really wanted a dragon type symbol... Back when I was 6, anyway. :P Little late there, pokemon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great! I really wanted a dragon type symbol&#8230; Back when I was 6, anyway. 😛 Little late there, pokemon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: porygandrew		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39710</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[porygandrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, it&#039;s a marketing ploy more than it is a game balance. I still like my idea of keeping the actual energy types minimal and just adding a sub-category that defines one of the 17 types. That way we don&#039;t end up with 17 different energy cards, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s a marketing ploy more than it is a game balance. I still like my idea of keeping the actual energy types minimal and just adding a sub-category that defines one of the 17 types. That way we don&#8217;t end up with 17 different energy cards, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Allie		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t play the game, and haven&#039;t collected the cards in years, but the designer in me is quite pleased with the icon. :3]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t play the game, and haven&#8217;t collected the cards in years, but the designer in me is quite pleased with the icon. :3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Similarity		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Similarity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t play the trading card game, so perhaps that invalidates my opinion, but... why Dragon? That seems like a strange type to suddenly start representing. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but there isn&#039;t even an Ice-type with which to oppose the newfound Dragon-type. This seems more like a merchandising decision than a decision for the sake of balancing the game. It seems more like a marketing choice, now allowing for lots of shiny new Dragon-type cards to be peddled out (using old Pokemon, no less) and sold as new and exciting just because they have a new, unusual type. Kind of weak, if you ask me, but then again, I really don&#039;t play the TCG, so I can&#039;t say any of this with perfect certainty.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t play the trading card game, so perhaps that invalidates my opinion, but&#8230; why Dragon? That seems like a strange type to suddenly start representing. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but there isn&#8217;t even an Ice-type with which to oppose the newfound Dragon-type. This seems more like a merchandising decision than a decision for the sake of balancing the game. It seems more like a marketing choice, now allowing for lots of shiny new Dragon-type cards to be peddled out (using old Pokemon, no less) and sold as new and exciting just because they have a new, unusual type. Kind of weak, if you ask me, but then again, I really don&#8217;t play the TCG, so I can&#8217;t say any of this with perfect certainty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Keyblader		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keyblader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seriously, thoug, I think I&#039;ll have to see one of the new Dragon cards before I pass Judgment on it. *pets Arceus*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, thoug, I think I&#8217;ll have to see one of the new Dragon cards before I pass Judgment on it. *pets Arceus*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: belmad		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39696</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belmad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39695&quot;&gt;kyogremaster&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, ir really didn&#039;t make sense. Why Psychic? Lots of poison pokemon&#039;s secondary types are bug and grass types. So it made sense in the first place.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39695">kyogremaster</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, ir really didn&#8217;t make sense. Why Psychic? Lots of poison pokemon&#8217;s secondary types are bug and grass types. So it made sense in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kyogremaster		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kyogremaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 23:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That makes ten types that are represented in the TCG.  There&#039;s plenty of Pokemon in each type now, so why not make all 17?

At the very least Poison should have gotten its own type when it changed from Grass to Psychic.  That made no sense to me at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes ten types that are represented in the TCG.  There&#8217;s plenty of Pokemon in each type now, so why not make all 17?</p>
<p>At the very least Poison should have gotten its own type when it changed from Grass to Psychic.  That made no sense to me at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: belmad		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39690</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belmad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39690</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It looks very good but why did they wait too much to add it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks very good but why did they wait too much to add it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Keyblader		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keyblader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 00:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Childhood = Ruined ;_;

...Kidding. But, it -is- a little weird. o.O]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Childhood = Ruined ;_;</p>
<p>&#8230;Kidding. But, it -is- a little weird. o.O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/2011/12/09/the-rare-and-elusive-tcg-post/#comment-39681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[THIS IS COOOL!!!!!
(lolidontlikepokebeach)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS COOOL!!!!!<br />
(lolidontlikepokebeach)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
