<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: IGN&#8217;s Top 10 Pokémon	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/</link>
	<description>Pokémon News, Rumors and Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 02:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: HydreigonRulez		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HydreigonRulez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 02:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My name says it all lol. Hydreigon should have been higher. IMHO, he looks better than Barney-I mean Dragonite.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My name says it all lol. Hydreigon should have been higher. IMHO, he looks better than Barney-I mean Dragonite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kitkat		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kitkat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I cant stand fans who hate the new pokemon! The thing that makes me most mad was seeing the bottom 10. These pokemon are not ugly but different, a complete BA gen would not be interesting cos there would be no variety. I personally weirdo pokemon cos they are different, emboar, garbodour they all look good but just different]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant stand fans who hate the new pokemon! The thing that makes me most mad was seeing the bottom 10. These pokemon are not ugly but different, a complete BA gen would not be interesting cos there would be no variety. I personally weirdo pokemon cos they are different, emboar, garbodour they all look good but just different</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Uli		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 16:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gen 1: Porygon
Gen 2: Lugia\porygon2
Gen 3: Metagross
Gen 4: Magnezone
Gen 5: Cofagrigus
Just my personal picks for each gen :P.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gen 1: Porygon<br />
Gen 2: Lugia\porygon2<br />
Gen 3: Metagross<br />
Gen 4: Magnezone<br />
Gen 5: Cofagrigus<br />
Just my personal picks for each gen :P.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Miles		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31526</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31447&quot;&gt;temp23&lt;/a&gt;.

Because it&#039;s overrated. EVERYONE likes Charizard. Besides, it&#039;s not even that cool.
The coolest? Well, there are several, but definitely not Charizard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31447">temp23</a>.</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s overrated. EVERYONE likes Charizard. Besides, it&#8217;s not even that cool.<br />
The coolest? Well, there are several, but definitely not Charizard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Moon walker		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moon walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 09:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How about making our own top 100 PJN?

You make a list, then people vote, like, their 10 favorite pokemon, and then you you make a list out of it ;D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about making our own top 100 PJN?</p>
<p>You make a list, then people vote, like, their 10 favorite pokemon, and then you you make a list out of it ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AdventureComicCreator		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdventureComicCreator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 07:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am gonna only say something,maybe it would be right(and a little bit funny) to replace them with -
1.Magikarp (nah,this weakling is so popular hahaha)
2.Lucario/Zoroark (even design,both pkmn are so cool)
3. Oshawott (all time favorite!)
4. Genesect (a beast,this should replace mewtwo)
5. Infernape (cool pose,that&#039;s all,i dont like its,typing)
6. Staraptor (cool emo hair(that&#039;s what i call its,something))
7. Squirtle (first starters ever choosen,from pkmn red)
8. Arceus (self-explanatory)
9.Rayquaza(overrated i know,but it has so much cool pose,or design huh)
10.Mudkip (not a mudkip fan,but i herd u liek mudkipz)
So why Magikarp? One thing,OVERRATED&#062;.&#060;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am gonna only say something,maybe it would be right(and a little bit funny) to replace them with &#8211;<br />
1.Magikarp (nah,this weakling is so popular hahaha)<br />
2.Lucario/Zoroark (even design,both pkmn are so cool)<br />
3. Oshawott (all time favorite!)<br />
4. Genesect (a beast,this should replace mewtwo)<br />
5. Infernape (cool pose,that&#8217;s all,i dont like its,typing)<br />
6. Staraptor (cool emo hair(that&#8217;s what i call its,something))<br />
7. Squirtle (first starters ever choosen,from pkmn red)<br />
8. Arceus (self-explanatory)<br />
9.Rayquaza(overrated i know,but it has so much cool pose,or design huh)<br />
10.Mudkip (not a mudkip fan,but i herd u liek mudkipz)<br />
So why Magikarp? One thing,OVERRATED&gt;.&lt;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyrannotaur		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyrannotaur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 21:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31401&quot;&gt;memenotyoume&lt;/a&gt;.

List of them all ranked here.. http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showthread.php?t=106990
To 10 most hated  list here... http://ds.ign.com/articles/116/1165634p1.html

And Tyranitar is awesome. what&#039;s not to like? :P]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31401">memenotyoume</a>.</p>
<p>List of them all ranked here.. <a href="http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showthread.php?t=106990" rel="nofollow ugc">http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showthread.php?t=106990</a><br />
To 10 most hated  list here&#8230; <a href="http://ds.ign.com/articles/116/1165634p1.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://ds.ign.com/articles/116/1165634p1.html</a></p>
<p>And Tyranitar is awesome. what&#8217;s not to like? 😛</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Masterge77		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31483</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Masterge77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 22:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31419&quot;&gt;Jason&lt;/a&gt;.

@Jason Adult fans of Pokemon at their finest, liking Gen 1 more than the other gens, and notice how the number of Pokemon listed from each gen goes down, with Gen 1 having the most on the list and Gen 5 having the least, yeah, definetly a bunch of GEEWUNers at work.....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31419">Jason</a>.</p>
<p>@Jason Adult fans of Pokemon at their finest, liking Gen 1 more than the other gens, and notice how the number of Pokemon listed from each gen goes down, with Gen 1 having the most on the list and Gen 5 having the least, yeah, definetly a bunch of GEEWUNers at work&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Masterge77		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Masterge77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 12:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31473&quot;&gt;Moose&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree, and it angered me that some of my favorite Pokemon (Floatzel, Mienshao, Ninetales, etc.) weren&#039;t even on the 100 list (well, Samurott, Flygon, and Lucario were on it), but at least a few of my favorite DC and Marvel villians were on their Top 100 Villians list (Magneto deserved to be #1 on that list)

I mean really, what were they thinking!? They each gave us a choice of only two Pokemon to choose from (seriously, we could have chosed from 5 or 7 Pokemon, but the guys at IGN had to be fools, since they hate the &quot;ugly&quot; Pokemon like Garbodor), and then gave us another 2, and another 2, etc. and they did not even go through all 649 Pokemon in the poll choices, just about 200 of them, and they had the final evolutions of all the starters except Emboar, all the Eeveelutions except Leafeon, as well as the ENTIRE evolution lines of the Gen 1 starters. Yeah, that poll was definetly rigged, simply for them to get their own way.

It&#039;s not about what the fans think, the choices they all gave us were the ones THEY thought were cool (that&#039;s pretty much cheating in my eyes), seriously, even the ugly Pokemon like Muk and Garbodor have fans too. I just find it sick to see the lengths IGN will go to piss off Pokemon fans

I think we should make our own Top 100 poll and choose the Pokemon WE choose (from all 649) to be on the list, not the ones THEY choose.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31473">Moose</a>.</p>
<p>I agree, and it angered me that some of my favorite Pokemon (Floatzel, Mienshao, Ninetales, etc.) weren&#8217;t even on the 100 list (well, Samurott, Flygon, and Lucario were on it), but at least a few of my favorite DC and Marvel villians were on their Top 100 Villians list (Magneto deserved to be #1 on that list)</p>
<p>I mean really, what were they thinking!? They each gave us a choice of only two Pokemon to choose from (seriously, we could have chosed from 5 or 7 Pokemon, but the guys at IGN had to be fools, since they hate the &#8220;ugly&#8221; Pokemon like Garbodor), and then gave us another 2, and another 2, etc. and they did not even go through all 649 Pokemon in the poll choices, just about 200 of them, and they had the final evolutions of all the starters except Emboar, all the Eeveelutions except Leafeon, as well as the ENTIRE evolution lines of the Gen 1 starters. Yeah, that poll was definetly rigged, simply for them to get their own way.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about what the fans think, the choices they all gave us were the ones THEY thought were cool (that&#8217;s pretty much cheating in my eyes), seriously, even the ugly Pokemon like Muk and Garbodor have fans too. I just find it sick to see the lengths IGN will go to piss off Pokemon fans</p>
<p>I think we should make our own Top 100 poll and choose the Pokemon WE choose (from all 649) to be on the list, not the ones THEY choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Moose		</title>
		<link>https://pokejungle.net/2011/05/02/igns-top-10-pokemon/#comment-31473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 05:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokejungle.net/?p=6576#comment-31473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If any of you saw the actual voting process, you&#039;d notice very quickly that the poll was completely rigged. You were shown two Pokemon and have to click on the one you like more. Then you get shown two more Pokemon, and so on. This would be fair if EVERY Pokemon had the same chance of being a choice, BUT a group of Pokemon were rigged to show up most(50-80%?) of the time, no surprise every one of those Pokemon got the top 25+ places! 

I&#039;m sorry, but I just find it disgusting that people would give positive attention to a bias poll.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any of you saw the actual voting process, you&#8217;d notice very quickly that the poll was completely rigged. You were shown two Pokemon and have to click on the one you like more. Then you get shown two more Pokemon, and so on. This would be fair if EVERY Pokemon had the same chance of being a choice, BUT a group of Pokemon were rigged to show up most(50-80%?) of the time, no surprise every one of those Pokemon got the top 25+ places! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I just find it disgusting that people would give positive attention to a bias poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
