It doesnt have blood or gore.

The game is perfect because its an arcade game and you can pick it up and play it without having to know how. Its fun and addicting.
It has all the core elements of a good game besides story, but story didnt always make a great game until RPGs came along.

He was actually pronouncing it similar to USA, Un-ov-a (Un of A = U S of A)

I like your theory better to be honest though.

I agree and disagree with you. Some of the localized attack and ability name changes didn’t need to be done. Shell Blade sounds better than the localization. Sap Sipper is harder on the tongue than Herbivore.

I know everything about pokemon and if i were to give a review it would be around 8.25-8.75. The games had potential but did not live up to all the hype. I enjoyed them but when you review you have to look at a technical comparison standpoint, not a biased fan one.

Many features could have been in the games that were not, including many popular ones. Also, the difficulty level was extremely low.

Gameinformer even gives games like COD, who they get money from for reviewing them, 8s. IT happens to any game that seems to be a rehash of a series and has potential but isnt as great as it could be.

They are professionals whether you agree with them or not. Just because you really enjoyed the game doesnt mean it deserves a high 9 or 10. They look at the core elements of a game. Most “blood and gore” games are well made. I dont like those kinds of game very much but I can pick out each core element of those games and compare them to other titles available.

Rating is different than enjoyment. When you are giving something a review/rating you have to look at it from a technical standpoint, not a biased fan standpoint.

Back then pokejungle had rumors and info pokebeach and serebii did not have. that has changed therefore people dont come here anymore.

How is 8.75 hatred? Thats a high B if you were to convert it to school grades.

It means the game has potential but didnt live up to it. Even COD games get this rating.

I wouldnt rate it 9 or 10. Non biased fans probably wouldnt either.

They are good games but they could be better. Difficulty was WAY too low and there were features they should have added but did not.

I agree with ozy. There were features that should have been in the games and the games were also pathetically easy.